Which describes how summaries should be written?

Which describes how summaries should be written?

• A. Complete yet concise.
• B. In-depth, opinionated, and evaluative.
• C. Long, exhaustive, and unbalanced.
• D. Based on a single sentence from the text.

Answer: (A)

Summaries capture the essential ideas and main points of a text in a brief, neutral form. The best description emphasizes complete coverage of the core message while staying concise—presenting the gist in your own words without adding personal opinions or extraneous detail. A complete yet concise summary means you include the key ideas and purpose, but skip minor details and examples that don’t change the overall meaning. The other options don’t fit because a summary isn’t meant to be down to opinion, evaluation, or deep analysis; it should be factual and objective. It shouldn’t be long and exhaustive, nor should it rely on only a single sentence from the text.

Summaries capture the essential ideas and main points of a text in a brief, neutral form. The best description emphasizes complete coverage of the core message while staying concise—presenting the gist in your own words without adding personal opinions or extraneous detail. A complete yet concise summary means you include the key ideas and purpose, but skip minor details and examples that don’t change the overall meaning.

The other options don’t fit because a summary isn’t meant to be down to opinion, evaluation, or deep analysis; it should be factual and objective. It shouldn’t be long and exhaustive, nor should it rely on only a single sentence from the text.